ArticleJournal of Brown hospital medicine2024
Rounds Redesign: Our Experience In Splitting Interdisciplinary Rounds.
Article in Journal of Brown hospital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Beyond Workarounds: Enhancing Education, Care, and Wellness on Inpatient Medicine Rotations -A Multicenter Qualitative Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our hospital developed and implemented a major redesign of interdisciplinary rounds in order to achieve more efficient interdisciplinary communication in this challenging post-COVID era. The goal was to involve all key participants in a structured initiative to improve discharge planning, review important patient safety indicators, and enhance patient-physician communication. The comprehensive redesign, based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement model, restructured the rounds into two distinct components: interdisciplinary disposition and clinical rounds. This new, dichotomous structure resulted in improved median discharge time, better identified estimated date of discharge and streamlined communication among care team providers. Combined with second rounds by physicians on patients getting discharged, there was an improvement in patient experience domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.