ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Predictive Validity of Preclerkship Performance Metrics on USMLE Step 2 CK Outcomes in the Step 1 Pass/Fail Era.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From prediction to advising: a multi model approach using NBME subject examinations to inform step 2 CK performance.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Performance Trends and Grading Variability in Clinical Education: A Record-Based Cross-Sectional Study of Medical Graduate Students at Mutah University, Jordan.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail, Step 2 CK has become a critical factor in residency selection. This study evaluates the predictive value of preclinical academic metrics for Step 2 CK outcomes to help students assess their metrics for residency before starting clerkships. Methods: We analyzed data from 58 students at the Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV. Academic metrics included MCAT scores, NBME-style Phase 1 exam performance, and CBSE scores. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between each predictor and Step 2 CK scores. Binary logistic regression was used, with Step 2 CK upper quartile (score >255) as the dependent variable and thresholds for each predictor as independent variables. Results: MCAT scores showed a moderate positive correlation with Step 2 CK (r=0.37, p=0.004). Students scoring >510 on the MCAT were significantly more likely to achieve >255 on Step 2 CK. Phase 1 NBME exam performance had the strongest correlation (r=0.67, p<0.0001), with students scoring above the national mean on >75% of exams more likely to achieve >255. While CBSE scores showed a similar correlation (r=0.67, p<0.0001), logistic regression analysis revealed that their predictive ability was less consistent for students in the middle performance range, indicating variability in classification utility. Conclusion: Preclinical NBME exam performance emerged as the strongest predictor of Step 2 CK success in our cohort, with MCAT and CBSE scores offering additional, though less robust, predictive value. These findings highlight the importance of early academic guidance to optimize residency preparedness and provide actionable insights for students assessing their readiness within the new Step 1 pass/fail framework. Further multi-institutional research is warranted to validate and generalize these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.