ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Impact of methicillin-resistant
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking Preoperative MRSA/MSSA Screening Through Molecular Triage.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of targeted infection prevention and control interventions on bloodstream infections and colonization with carbapenem-resistant organisms among hospitalized neonates, Bangladesh, 2023-2024.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the impact of screening and decolonization on methicillin-resistant Study Design: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study comparing patient characteristics among MRSA-colonized and MRSA-infected infants, rates of MRSA infection before and after screening with targeted decolonization, and MRSA infection among those receiving single or combined decolonization agents. Setting: Texas Children's Hospital Pavilion for Women is a 42-bed level three neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Houston, TX. Patients: Neonates admitted to the NICU from 2012 to 2022 were included in analysis of MRSA colonization and infection. The gestational age ranged from 22 weeks to 42 weeks. Interventions: The MRSA screening methodology consisted of weekly surveillance PCR or culture on admission until discharge. If positive, infants underwent decolonization consisting of topical intranasal mupirocin, and if meeting the gestational and chronological age-based criteria, topical 2% chlorhexidine wipes and topical intranasal mupirocin. Results: The MRSA colonization rate from 2016 to 2022 was 2.2%. Following the screening and decolonization protocol initiated in 2016, there was a sustained downtrend in the rate of MRSA infection. No MRSA-colonized neonates who received both topical mupirocin and Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) developed MRSA infection. Conclusions: We observed a decreased rate of MRSA infection in the NICU following implementation of an MRSA screening and decolonization protocol. While our data suggests that the combination of mupirocin and CHG might prevent infection, further studies are needed due to the low prevalence of MRSA infection in our cohort.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.