ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Perioperative outcomes in patients with symptomatic versus asymptomatic previous COVID-19 infection undergoing neurosurgical treatment (post-COVID-19 study).
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection (long-COVID) are being increasingly recognized. The long-COVID effects are more likely in individuals who were symptomatic than asymptomatic during their previous COVID-19 infection. The data on perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing elective neurosurgery long after their recovery from COVID-19 infection is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes after elective neurosurgery between patients who were symptomatic and those who were asymptomatic during their previous COVID-19 infection. The secondary objectives were to compare the earlier COVID-19 characteristics and the perioperative pulmonary profile during current surgery between these groups. Material and Methods: This prospective observational study was performed in adult patients undergoing elective neurosurgery with history of previous COVID-19 infection. Data was collected regarding previous COVID-19 infection (symptoms, hospitalization, treatment, complications, etc.) and current perioperative characteristics (pulmonary profile, perioperative complications, hospital stay, mortality, etc.). Results: A total of 50 patients were recruited during the study period, of which 35 (73%) patients were symptomatic during previous COVID-19 infection (two patients were excluded). The mean duration between current surgery and previous COVID-19 infection was 7 months. Patients symptomatic during earlier COVID-19 infection were females, older, and had a lower oxygen level during current surgery. There was no difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups in adverse perioperative outcomes such as desaturation, pulmonary or extrapulmonary complications, or non-extubation. Conclusion: The perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing elective neurosurgery with previous mild to moderate symptomatic COVID-19 infection may not be different from those of patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.