ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively newer approach to the paraspinal fascial plane block. The analgesic efficacy of this block is presently being established in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This meta-analysis was designed to assess the effectiveness of ESPB as a perioperative analgesic technique when compared with conventional analgesia (control) in PCNL. Material and Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of ESPB for perioperative analgesia in PCNL for renal stone disease. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and EMBASE using the terms ((erector spinae plane block) AND ((Analgesia) OR (visual analogue scale) OR (VAS) OR (opioid*) OR (morphine) OR (tramadol))) AND ((percutaneous nephrolithotomy) OR (PCNL)) with an intention to include all the randomized studies comparing ESPB with the control group. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2. Results: A total of 187 records were identified and after the exclusions, a total of 10 trials (560 patients, 503 for primary outcome) were included. Pain scores were significantly lower in the ESPB group as compared to the control group except at the 12 Conclusions: ESPB is more effective than conventional analgesia in terms of postoperative opioid consumption after PCNL. Future studies should incorporate better double-blinding techniques, transparent reporting of methods, and sham controls (such as additional dressing post general anesthesia) which were lacking in the current studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.