Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026722›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Estimating the usefulness of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and caval aorta index to predict hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective surgery in a tertiary care hospital.

M V Eeshwar, Alankrita Chari, Yogesh K Gaude, Abhishek Rao Kordcal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M V EeshwarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Alankrita ChariDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ramaiah Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Yogesh K GaudeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Manipal Hospital, Dona Paula, Goa, India.
Abhishek Rao KordcalDepartment of Anaesthesiology, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Post-spinal anaesthesia hypotension (PSAH) can occur in 25-75% of patients. The preload or volume status of a patient is an important contributor to PSAH, and coloading with fluids is advocated to prevent PSAH. Instead of blind volume loading, prediction of volume status using inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index (IVCCI) and caval aorta index (IVC: Ao index) may be used to guide fluid administration. Material and Methods: In our study, we used ultrasound in the immediate pre-operative period to calculate IVCCI and IVC: Ao index in patients scheduled for elective surgery in the supine position, under spinal anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia was given in the lateral position with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Patients were placed supine thereafter, sensory blockade level was ascertained, and blood pressure (BP) was measured every 2 min for 30 min. Episodes of hypotension were treated with fluids or vasopressors as per the discretion of the treating anaesthesiologist. In the study, 73 patients were screened, out of which 69 were included. Results: Totally, 23 participants out of 69 developed PSAH. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was made and the area under the curve analysis was done on our collected data. We found that IVC: Ao index has better sensitivity (0.696 for IVC: Ao index ≤0.810) and specificity (0.717 for IVC: Ao index ≤0.810) than IVCCI (sensitivity 0.522 and specificity 0.630 for IVCCI ≥33.32%) to predict PSAH. Conclusion: IVC: Ao index is a better predictor of PSAH than IVCCI. Thus, it may be used to predict volume status and guide in coloading with fluids during spinal anaesthesia.

Indexed as

Caval aortic indexIVC collapsibility indexpost-spinal anaesthesia hypotensionspinal anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40026722
PMCPMC11867348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.