ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparison between dexmedetomidine and ketofol in the prevention of postoperative emergence delirium in pediatric patients undergoing orofacial cleft surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Emergence delirium (ED) is a common postoperative complication in pediatric patients. To avoid postoperative ED, sedative medications have been utilized in addition to general anesthesia. In this study, the primary objective was to assess the incidence of postoperative emergence of delirium at 0-, 10-, 20-, 30-, and 60-min intervals. Secondary objective was to assess postoperative analgesia (0, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min) and hemodynamic parameters (mean arterial pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation). Material and Methods: In this randomized controlled study, 105 American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients, aged between 3 months and 2 years, scheduled for orofacial cleft surgery were enrolled. Patients of group I received dexmedetomidine (0.3 μg/kg), group II received ketofol (a mixture of ketamine 0.25 mg/kg and propofol 1.0 mg/kg), and group III received normal saline 10 min before extubation. The incidence of postoperative ED using the Watcha scale and the postoperative pain using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale were recorded. Results: The Watcha scale at the immediate postoperative period and at 10-, 20-, 30-, and 60-min intervals was 0 (1), 1 (1.75), 1 (1), 2 (2), and 3 (2) in group I, 1 (1), 2 (1), 2 (2), 2 (3), and 3 (2) in group II, and 2 (1), 3 (1), 3 (1.25), 4 (1), and 4.5 (1.5) in group III, respectively, at the above time points. On comparing group I with groups II and III, the difference was significant ( Conclusions: We conclude that both dexmedetomidine and ketofol are effective in reducing postoperative ED. Dexmedetomidine is more effective than ketofol in preventing postoperative ED in the pediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.