All Iron Battery 3.0.

Dipak Koirala, Surendra K Gautam, I Francis Cheng, Peter B Allen

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in HardwareX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dipak KoiralaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr, MS 2343, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.

Surendra K GautamDepartment of Chemistry, Tri-Chandra Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.

I Francis ChengDepartment of Chemistry, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr, MS 2343, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.

Peter B AllenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Dr, MS 2343, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Battery storage technology can address a key limitation to renewable energy. Renewable electricity generation (solar and wind) is intermittent. An inexpensive energy storage device with excellent rechargeability and safety is critical for grid applications and for the global transition to renewable energy. In this work, we introduce an energy storage secondary battery based on an aqueous all-iron chemistry with redox mediators. The cell employs commodity chemicals methyl viologen and 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) at the anode and cathode, respectively. The result is a highly rechargeable, low-cost energy storage system with a good price-performance ratio compared to commercial rechargeable batteries that is stable for 100+ cycles with 84 % capacity retention. The cell has a volumetric capacity of 9.6 Ah/L (energy of 11.52 wh/L) and power density of 72 Watts/m

Indexed as

BatteryGrid scale storageOpen sourceRedox mediatorsRenewable electricity

Identifiers

PMID40026677

DOI10.1016/j.ohx.2025.e00629

PMCPMC11869601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.