ArticleHealth care science2025
Study on the Effects of National Volume-Based Procurement of Chemical Drugs on Chinese Patent Medicines: Lipid-Lowering Drugs as an Example.
Article in Health care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Contingent Payoff of Transparency: The Mediating Roles of Citizen Participation and Enforcement in Health Service Delivery Improvement.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of China's National Volume-Based Procurement policy exclusively for insulin on the volume, expenditure and price: an interrupted time series analysis in Guangdong Province.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. This study aims to explore the impact of national volume-based procurement (NVBP) on Chinese patent medicines and provide evidence for improving policies and promoting rational drug use. Methods: The study was based on data from the China National Health Insurance Agency that spanned January 2019 to December 2020. Descriptive analysis was conducted using volume and expenditure as variables. Interrupted time series analysis was applied to further analyze Chinese patent medicines. Results: The unit prices of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin decreased by 25%-96%, whereas the prices of Zhibitai and Xuezhikang fluctuated slightly. The affordability is measured as the monthly expenditure on treatment divided by the daily wage. After policy implementation, the affordability of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin improved from 0.242 to 0.014 and from 0.247 to 0.019, respectively. The defined daily doses (DDDs) for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin also increased, whereas total expenditures decreased in hospitals of all levels. Both at the national level and at all levels of hospital, the policy had no significant impact on expenditures for Zhibitai and Xuezhikang and their defined daily doses. Conclusions: The NVBP saved costs in the short term by incorporating high-quality, widely used lipid-lowering drugs. Notably, the policy impacted lipid-lowering chemical drugs, whereas Chinese patent medicines remained largely unaffected. Doctors' use of Chinese patent medicines did not decline, highlighting the clinical specificity of these medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.