ReviewHealth care science2025
A Comprehensive Review of Experimental Models of Stress: Pragmatic Insight Into Psychoneuroimmunology.
Review in Health care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychoneuroimmunology is a scientific discipline exploring the interconnectedness of the nervous system, emotion state, and immune system. The current review examines the distinct mechanisms through which the mind and body interact when subjected to stress. Manifestations of psychoneuroimmunological stress encompass symptoms such as depression, aggression, fear, and social withdrawal, which can exert a profound impact on physiological well-being. Some observations suggest that humans and nonhuman animals exhibit similar stress-related symptoms, aiding in the identification of pharmacological pathways and potential clinical implications of therapeutic interventions. Animal stress models are predicated on varying approaches aimed at eliciting a motivational state to navigate and confront aversive circumstances. The current review describes the diverse stress induction models that have been investigated internationally, incorporating an ethological perspective that involves evaluating innate and unpunished behaviors through methodologies like the elevated plus maze, elevated zero maze, light-dark box, and open field test. Additionally, conditioned operant conflict tests, such as the Vogel conflict test, fall under the purview of learning and punishment models. This category encompasses classic conditioning models like fear conditioning, psychosocial models such as social defeat, and physical and chronic unpredictable stress paradigms. In this review, we critically evaluate existing cognitive and behavioral frameworks underpinning the development and perpetuation of stress-related disorders, while also elucidating the impact of immune system responses on the mental and physical health of animals. The primary objective of this review is to elucidate the array of animal models employed in previous research and the testing protocols used to assess animal performance in stress induction scenarios, with the ultimate aim of reducing mortality rates among research animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.