ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
3D bioprinting technology innovation in female reproductive system.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translational Application of Biomedical Microrobots in Female Reproductive System.ACS nano medicine · 2026Review
- Engineering ovarian tissue via biofabrication and 3D bioprinting: Challenges and emerging perspectives.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Review
- Integrative bioengineering strategies for endometrial regeneration: From biomaterials and stem cells to organoids and organ-on-a-chip technologies.Theranostics · 2026Review
- 3D bioprinting innovations: a new frontier in breast cancer research.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing cancer care: Bioprinting prostate cancer stem cells for targeted treatments.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Silk-Ovarioids: establishment and characterization of a human ovarian primary cell 3D-model system.Human reproduction open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several diseases affect the female reproductive system, and both disease factors and treatments impact its integrity and function. Consequently, understanding the mechanisms of disease occurrence and exploring treatment methods are key research focuses in obstetrics and gynecology. However, constructing accurate disease models requires a microenvironment closely resembling the human body, and current animal models and 2D in vitro cell models fall short in this regard. Thus, innovative in vitro female reproductive system models are urgently needed. Additionally, female reproductive system diseases often cause tissue loss, yet effective tissue repair and regeneration have long been a bottleneck in the medical field. 3D bioprinting offers a solution by enabling the construction of implants with tissue repair and regeneration capabilities, promoting cell adhesion, extension, and proliferation. This helps maintain the long-term efficacy of bioactive implants and achieves both structural and functional repair of the reproductive system. By combining live cells with biomaterials, 3D bioprinting can create in vitro 3D biomimetic cellular models, facilitating in-depth studies of cell-cell and cell-extracellular microenvironment interactions, which enhances our understanding of reproductive system diseases and supports disease-specific drug screening. This article reviews 3D bioprinting methods and materials applicable to the female reproductive system, discussing their advantages and limitations to aid in selecting optimal 3D bioprinting strategies. We also summarize and critically evaluate recent advancements in 3D bioprinting applications for tissue regeneration and in vitro disease models and address the prospects and challenges for translating 3D bioprinting technology into clinical applications within the female reproductive system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.