ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2025
A generalized coherence framework for quantifying input contributions in multi-input systems with correlated or uncorrelated inputs.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In multi-input systems, it is often necessary to quantify the contribution of each input to an output. Such contribution analysis is frequently performed using coherence. However, when correlation is present between inputs, existing coherence measures do not accurately quantify the contribution of individual inputs, except in special cases. Here we propose an expanded coherence framework that enables contribution analysis in any multi-input system, regardless of input correlation. We bridged the gap by defining three new coherence measures: component, excluded, and isolated coherence. Component coherence is an intermediate measure that decomposes measured output power into components attributable to inputs directly vs to interference between inputs. Strategically summing component coherence terms yields contributions from individual inputs, defined as either excluded coherence (the portion of the output that would be removed if a given input were excluded) or isolated coherence (the portion of the output that would remain if a given input were isolated). To demonstrate, we simulated a three-input system and compared both existing and novel coherence measures to the known contributions at varying levels of input correlation. We also demonstrated a real-world application of these measures in a case study on Essential Tremor. Only excluded and isolated coherence accurately estimated the true contributions at all levels of input correlation. Even when existing coherence measures accurately estimated true contributions, novel measures did the same, but with less random error. These new coherence measures represent a generalization of the existing framework that enables accurate contribution analysis in multi-input systems regardless of input correlation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.