ReviewTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
Progress in Porcine Kidney Transplantation to Non-Human Primates.
Review in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transplant International: Looking Back at 2025, Looking Forward to 2026.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
- The First Clinical Renal Xenotransplantation Study (EXPAND): Evaluating Safety, Function, and Zoonotic Risks.Health care science · 2025Article
- Early Experimental Report of the First 8-Gene-Edited Pig-to-Rhesus Macaque Cardiac Xenotransplantation in China.XenotransplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal xenotransplantation has recently made considerable progress in overcoming the barrier to its use in humans. This progress has been made possible owing to the use of preclinical pig-to-primate models. Overall, renal xenotransplantation has long been associated with lower survival rates than that of porcine hearts (mainly due to its life-sustaining nature). However, the use of the latest strains of genetically modified porcine donors, combined with progress in the control of the anti-porcine immune response and coagulation, has now enabled survival of up to 2 years. Although the pig-to-primate combination has long been considered a perfect reflection of the human situation, it has several limitations, particularly in terms of different natural anti-porcine antibodies. This fact, in association with survival prolongation, which is considered a prerequisite, has led some pioneering teams to cross the line of human application. However, use in humans will remain anecdotal, and further progress in renal xenotransplantation will be difficult to achieve without the use of non-human primates, which will remain complementary, particularly with regard to major innovations that have never been tested in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.