Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026595›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Development and testing of a device to detect trigger points, and local twitch responses in dry needling intervention.

Manoj Kumar Sharma, Sarika Chaudhary, Hardika Sood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manoj Kumar SharmaMYAS-GNDU Department of Sports Sciences and Medicine, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritar, Punjab, India.
Sarika ChaudharyMYAS-GNDU Department of Sports Sciences and Medicine, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritar, Punjab, India.
Hardika SoodMediRehab, MediGence, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trigger point dry needling (TrpDN) has emerged as a promising intervention for the treatment of myofascial pain. This involves insertion of a sterile filament needle directly into the trigger point (Trp), with the aim of eliciting a local twitch response (LTR). This sudden, involuntary contraction of the muscle fibers confirms the breakdown and success of TrpDN intervention. Not all LTRs are perceptible through visual observation or tactile sensation during the intervention. In search of noticeable LTR, clinicians perform Hong's technique (back-and-forth movements of needle in muscle). This results in muscle damage and causes pain and discomfort thereby limiting functional movements of patients. One important factor in the diagnosis and post intervention follow-up of TrpDN is the pain pressure threshold (PPT). Currently most of the clinicians use thumb pressure and subjective scales for confirming trigger points. These methods can introduce biasness due to its reliance on subjective factors.•In this present study, an effort has been made to assemble a device to overcome the challenges faced during assessment and treatment of trigger points.•This device can provide audiovisual feedback for LTR and can measure PPT.

Indexed as

Local twitch responseLocal twitch response and pain pressure threshold devicePain assessmentPain pressure thresholdTrigger point dry needling

Identifiers

PMID40026595
PMCPMC11872452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.