Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026532›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2025

Genetic Monitoring of Brown Trout Released Into a Novel Environment: Establishment and Genetic Impact on Natural Populations.

Anastasia Andersson, Sara Kurland, Sten Karlsson, Nils Ryman, Linda Laikre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anastasia AnderssonDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5698-4948
Sara KurlandDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-1236
Sten KarlssonNorwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7191-7997
Nils RymanDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3342-8479
Linda LaikreDepartment of Zoology Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9286-3361

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translocations are carried out either unintentionally or intentionally for conservation or management reasons. In both cases, translocated populations may genetically impact natural populations via introgression. Understanding how genetic background may affect an establishment in a novel environment and the potential risks for native populations is important for biodiversity conservation. Here, using a panel of 96 SNPs, we monitor the establishment of two genetically and ecologically distinct brown trout populations released into a mountain lake system in central Sweden where trout did not occur prior to the release. The release was carried out in 1979, and we monitor the establishment over the first three decades (5-6 generations) in seven lakes downstream of the release site. We find that extensive hybridization has occurred, and genes from both populations exist in all lakes examined. Genes from the population that was nonmigratory in its native environment have remained to a higher degree in the area close to the release site, while genes from the population that was more migratory in its native habitat have spread further downstream. All established populations exhibit higher levels of genetic diversity than the released populations. Natural, stream-resident brown trout populations occur ~15 km downstream of the release site and below a waterfall that acts as an upstream migration barrier. Released fish have spread genes to these populations but with low introgression rates of 3%-8%. Recently adopted indicators for monitoring genetic diversity were partly able to detect this introgression, emphasizing the usefulness of genetic indicators in management. The SNP panel used in this study provides a similar picture as previously used allozymes, showing that older marker systems with fewer loci may still be useful for describing the population structure.

Indexed as

indicators for genetic diversitymonitoring genetic diversitypopulation geneticsSalmo trutta

Identifiers

PMID40026532
PMCPMC11868033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.