ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Predictive Value of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Parameters in Patients under Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with High Pulse Pressure.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The correlation between cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) parameters and the prognosis of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with high pulse pressure (PP) is unclear. The purpose of present study is to investigate the correlation of CPET parameters in patients under PCI with high PP and assess their reference value for prognosis. Methods: Individuals aged 18 years and older who were diagnosed with coronary artery disease (CAD) and underwent PCI along with CPET from November 1, 2015 to September 30, 2021 were enrolled. The patients were categorized into two groups based on PP: high PP group (PP of males ≥50 mmHg; PP of females ≥60 mmHg) and normal PP group (PP of males <50 mmHg; PP of females <60 mmHg). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The optimal predictors of MACE were identified through Cox regression analysis. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was measured to evaluate the discriminatory ability in patients with high PP. Results: A total of 2785 patients were included in present study, with a median follow-up period of 1215 (687-1586) days. Through multifactorial analysis, it was determined that peak oxygen uptake (peak VO Conclusions: The prognosis of CAD patients with high PP was worse compared to the patients with normal PP. The peak VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.