Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026497›Full record

ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Machine Learning Model-Based Prediction of In-Hospital Acute Kidney Injury Risk in Acute Aortic Dissection Patients.

Zhili Wei, Shidong Liu, Yang Chen, Hongxu Liu, Guangzu Liu, Yuan Hu, Bing Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhili WeiThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Shidong LiuThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yang ChenThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Hongxu LiuThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Guangzu LiuThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yuan HuThe First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Bing SongDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, 730000 Lanzhou, Gansu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-0265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) and to establish a machine learning model for predicting in-hospital AKI. Methods: We extracted data on patients with AAD from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database and developed seven machine learning models: support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), neural network (NNET), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and categorical boosting (CatBoost). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the optimal model was interpreted using Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) visualization analysis. Results: A total of 325 patients with AAD were identified from the MIMIC-IV database, of which 84 patients (25.85%) developed in-hospital AKI. This study collected 42 features, with nine selected for model building. A total of 70% of the patients were randomly allocated to the training set, while the remaining 30% were allocated to the test set. Machine learning models were built on the training set and validated using the test set. In addition, we collected AAD patient data from the MIMIC-III database for external validation. Among the seven machine learning models, the CatBoost model performed the best, with an AUC of 0.876 in the training set and 0.723 in the test set. CatBoost also performed strongly during the validation, achieving an AUC of 0.712. SHAP visualization analysis identified the most important risk factors for in-hospital AKI in AAD patients as maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), body mass index (BMI), urine output, maximum glucose (GLU), minimum BUN, minimum creatinine, maximum creatinine, weight and acute physiology score III (APSIII). Conclusions: The CatBoost model, constructed using risk factors including maximum and minimum BUN levels, BMI, urine output, and maximum GLU, effectively predicts the risk of in-hospital AKI in AAD patients and shows compelling results in further validations.

Indexed as

acute aortic dissectionacute kidney injurymachine learningprediction model

Identifiers

PMID40026497
PMCPMC11868902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.