ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Machine Learning Model-Based Prediction of In-Hospital Acute Kidney Injury Risk in Acute Aortic Dissection Patients.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An LLM-enhanced AI agent for rapid diagnosis of acute aortic dissection in multi-center settings.iScience · 2026Article
- Assessing the prognostic impact of body composition phenotypes on surgical outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine-learning model for early prediction of acute kidney injury in polytrauma patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches for risk prediction in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting acute kidney injury after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective multicenter study.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify the risk factors for in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with acute aortic dissection (AAD) and to establish a machine learning model for predicting in-hospital AKI. Methods: We extracted data on patients with AAD from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database and developed seven machine learning models: support vector machine (SVM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), neural network (NNET), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and categorical boosting (CatBoost). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the optimal model was interpreted using Shapley Additive explanations (SHAP) visualization analysis. Results: A total of 325 patients with AAD were identified from the MIMIC-IV database, of which 84 patients (25.85%) developed in-hospital AKI. This study collected 42 features, with nine selected for model building. A total of 70% of the patients were randomly allocated to the training set, while the remaining 30% were allocated to the test set. Machine learning models were built on the training set and validated using the test set. In addition, we collected AAD patient data from the MIMIC-III database for external validation. Among the seven machine learning models, the CatBoost model performed the best, with an AUC of 0.876 in the training set and 0.723 in the test set. CatBoost also performed strongly during the validation, achieving an AUC of 0.712. SHAP visualization analysis identified the most important risk factors for in-hospital AKI in AAD patients as maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUN), body mass index (BMI), urine output, maximum glucose (GLU), minimum BUN, minimum creatinine, maximum creatinine, weight and acute physiology score III (APSIII). Conclusions: The CatBoost model, constructed using risk factors including maximum and minimum BUN levels, BMI, urine output, and maximum GLU, effectively predicts the risk of in-hospital AKI in AAD patients and shows compelling results in further validations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.