ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Relationships of hematocrit concentration with dementia from a multiethnic population-based study.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anemia, iron deficiency, and blood biomarkers for Alzheimer disease: clinical interpretation and dementia risk stratification.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Red blood cell (RBC) concentration impacts cerebrovascular disease, yet it is unclear whether RBC concentrations relate to dementia risk, particularly in racially/ethnically diverse cohorts. We investigated whether RBC concentrations associate with incident dementia risk in a diverse population of stroke-free individuals and explored whether cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) mediates this relationship. Methods: A longitudinal observational analysis was performed using a population-based cohort of stroke-free, older adult participants (>50 years) from the Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS) enrolled between 2003 and 2008. Participants received baseline hematocrit testing, MRI neuroimaging, and cognitive assessments at baseline and long-term follow-up. Associations of baseline hematocrit as a categorical variable (low, normal [reference], and high based on laboratory reference levels) with incident dementia were assessed using Cox models adjusting for relevant covariates. Separate analyses investigated whether MRI CSVD mediated these relationships. Results: We studied 1,207 NOMAS participants (mean age 71 ± 9 years, 60% female, 66% Hispanic). Mean hematocrit was 41.2% (±3.8) with 16% of participants developing incident dementia. Lower hematocrit associated with increased dementia risk (adjusted hazard ratio 1.81 [1.01-3.23]) after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, APOE status, and comorbidities. High hematocrit was not associated with dementia risk. No interactions by sex or race/ethnicity were seen and baseline CSVD did not mediate relationships between hematocrit and dementia. Conclusion: Low hematocrit associated with dementia risk in our diverse population cohort. However, our study limitations in laboratory and neuroimaging timing in addition to clarifying mechanistic underpinnings for our observations necessitates further work to clarify whether anemia can serve as a trackable, preventable/treatable risk factor for dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.