Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026377›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2025

A "Dock-Work" Orange: A Dual-Receptor Biochemical Theory on the Deterrence Induced by Citrusy Aroma on Elephant Traffic Central to a Conservation Effort.

Dilantha Gunawardana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dilantha GunawardanaIndependent Researcher, Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5086-0215

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation of elephants requires physical, chemical, and biological approaches to ensure the protection of these gargantuan pachyderms. One such approach is using orange plants (as biofencing) for the repellence of elephants, which precludes catastrophic events related to the encroachment of elephants into human habitats. Elephants have sensitive olfactory discrimination of plant volatile compounds for foraging and other behavior using G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, 2 such receptors are the A2A and A2B receptors mediating olfaction elicited by a host of ligands, including limonene, the main volatile compound in citrus plants, which is hypothesized to be the chief repelling agent. Bioinformatics at the protein and mRNA levels (BLAST/Multiple Sequence Alignments) were employed to explore the multiple expression products of A2B receptors, namely full-length and truncated proteins produced by isoform mRNAs translated from multiple methionines, while the comparison of the limonene-binding pockets of human and elephant A2B receptors and prediction servers [Netphos 3.1; Protter] was used to focus, respectively, on the contacts limonene binding entails and the post-translational modifications that are involved in cell signaling. Finally, the link between limonene and antifeedant activity was explored by considering limonene content on trees that are preferentially foraged or avoided as part of the feeding behavior by elephants. The African bush elephant (

Indexed as

A2A receptorsA2B receptorscitrusconservationelephantslimonene

Identifiers

PMID40026377
PMCPMC11869256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.