Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026375›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2025

The Relationship Between the Mental Health of Slovenian Adolescents and the Support of their Various Personal Social Networks.

Anja Knez, Irena Makivić, Helena Jeriček Klanšček

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anja KnezSigmund Freud University Vienna - Ljubljana Branch, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9008-2314
Irena MakivićNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2748-5522
Helena Jeriček KlanščekNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva cesta 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4337-6449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To analyse the relationships between individual social networks and selected indicators of mental health among Slovenian adolescents aged 15 and 17. Methods: Data from the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey in 2018 were used. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to calculate the reliability of the scales. Data were presented using descriptive statistics and frequency distributions. Differences between the two groups were determined using the chi-square or t-test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test the associations. Multiple linear regression was also used to explain adolescents' mental health. Results: The mental health of adolescents is statistically significantly related to the experience of support in their social networks (p≤0.05). Adolescents with better mental health differ from those with poorer mental health in the degree to which they experience support from their social networks. Support from a greater number of social networks is statistically significantly associated with lower perceived stress and the risk of depression. In explaining adolescents' good mental health, the support of the school environment, i.e. classmates and teachers, proved to be more important than the support of the family. Conclusions: The support of personal social networks is essential for good mental health in young people. In practice, it would be reasonable to strengthen the support of teachers and classmates, as the school environment proved to be a very important source of support at that age.

Indexed as

AdolescentsFamilyFriendsMental healthSchoolSocial support

Identifiers

PMID40026375
PMCPMC11870321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.