Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026374›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2025

Cultural Adaptation of Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys (PaRIS) Patient and Primary Care Practice Questionnaires to the Slovenian Context.

Matija Ambrož, Nina Ropret, Pia Vračko, Eva Murko, Candan Kendir, Lucija Bosnjak, Rachel Williams, Zalika Klemenc-Ketiš

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matija AmbrožLjubljana Community Health Centre, Metelkova 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3406-5693
Nina RopretNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-9038
Pia VračkoNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9476-9918
Eva MurkoNational Institute of Public Health, Trubarjeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1600-9838
Candan KendirDirectorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6877-4836
Lucija BosnjakIpsos UK, 3 Thomas More Square, London, E1W 1YW, UK.
Rachel WilliamsIpsos UK, 3 Thomas More Square, London, E1W 1YW, UK.
Zalika Klemenc-KetišLjubljana Community Health Centre, Metelkova 9, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-1754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of the study is to describe the adaptation process (with emphasis on cognitive testing) of the Slovenian version of the PaRIS international survey, including two questionnaires to assess patient-reported health outcomes and the experiences of adults living with one or more chronic conditions managed in primary care settings: (1) Patient questionnaire (targets patients aged 45 and older) and (2) Provider questionnaire (targets health care providers working in primary care). Methods: The translation process of both PaRIS questionnaires followed a team-based double translation and reconciliation approach. Cognitive interviewing with 29 participants was performed. An analysis grid and debriefing were implemented, and the cognitive testing rating was assessed for each tested question. Cross-national error source typology (CNEST) was used. Results: The results of cognitive interviewing revealed difficulties in 30 questions / segments (out of a total of 44 tested) in the Patient questionnaire and difficulties in 23 questions / segments (out of a total of 24 tested) in the Provider questionnaire. In both questionnaires most difficulties were identified as poor source question design. Conclusions: Our study showed that cognitive interviewing is a crucial step in questionnaire adaptation, especially while transferring internationally developed questionnaires on Patient Reported Experience Measures and Patient Reported Outcome Measures into different national contexts. Through a rigorous process of translation and cognitive testing, we obtained better quality PREMs and PROMs measures in the Slovenian language. However, the measurement tools need to be piloted, and psychometrically evaluated in future to test reliability and validity.

Indexed as

Cognitive testingOutcome MeasurePatient ReportedPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID40026374
PMCPMC11870316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.