Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026373›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2025

Barriers and Facilitators of Family Meetings in Primary Palliative Care: Insights From Slovenia.

Mirjam Bajt, Lucija Jagodic Klipšteter, Erika Zelko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mirjam BajtZdravstveni dom Logatec, Notranjska cesta 2, 1370 Logatec, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3643-484X
Lucija Jagodic KlipšteterZdravstveni dom Logatec, Notranjska cesta 2, 1370 Logatec, Slovenia.
Erika ZelkoInstitute for General Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altberger Strasse 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-9118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Within palliative care, family meetings are recognised as the most effective practice for placing the patient and their family at the centre of care, thereby ensuring quality palliative care. The aim of this study was to determine how these meetings are conducted in primary healthcare and to identify the factors influencing them. Methods: Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with family physicians (FP) in Slovenia, who were expressly, and using the snowball method, invited to participate in the study. Transcripts were analysed using the principles of thematic analysis. Results: It was found that participating FPs frequently discuss diseases, treatment, expectations and goals with patients and families. However, these discussions are seldom structured and fully conducted according to family meeting guidelines, primarily due to time constraints. Barriers to conducting family meetings include patient and family reluctance, the staff's lack of palliative care knowledge, time, and financial challenges. Positive factors include a good doctor-patient-family relationship, an exact diagnosis, the doctor's experience and competence, additional palliative care training and the presence of other team members. Conclusion: Our research provides a unique insight into the implementation of family meetings at the primary level in Slovenia. FPs recognise numerous benefits of family meetings and consider them meaningful and time efficient. They emphasise that open discussions with the patient and their family are crucial for quality palliative care at the primary level. Considering simpler models of family meetings for the primary level appears sensible. Further research is needed to assess the cost-benefit relationship of family meetings.

Indexed as

Family meetingsFamily physiciansPalliative carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID40026373
PMCPMC11870319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.