ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2025
Comparative Study of Machine Learning and System Identification for Process Systems Engineering Dynamics.
Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides a comprehensive benchmarking of traditional system identification and modern machine learning (ML) models for the data-driven modeling of dynamical systems, with a focus on process systems engineering (PSE) applications. To achieve this, we deploy AutoSID, an automated end-to-end framework inspired by Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) principles. While AutoSID facilitates model selection, training, validation, and evaluation, its purpose here is to serve as a platform to investigate how well MLOps-inspired tools can be adapted for system identification tasks in PSE. Our investigation includes a comparison of 12 diverse model architectures from the system identification, machine learning, and deep learning literature, evaluated across 11 PSE case studies under varying data regimes. We employ four model search or hyperparameter optimization algorithms and three model selection criteria to ensure a thorough assessment. Our findings highlight the importance of model selection as the crucial step in system identification. Specifically, our results demonstrate the effectiveness of Bayesian optimization with tree-structured parzen estimators (TPE) for balanced model selection, while k-fold cross-validation proves to be a robust metric for performance evaluation during the selection process. In large-scale data scenarios, where performance differences between
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.