ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
The extent and type of use, opportunities and concerns of ChatGPT in community pharmacy: A survey of community pharmacy staff.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of large language model responses to patient questions on oral anticoagulant therapy: a comparative expert assessment.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Since the widespread availability of Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT), the public is confronted with accessible artificial intelligence tools. There is limited knowledge on the use, concerns and opportunities of ChatGPT in pharmacy practice in the Netherlands. Objectives: The aims of this study were to explore the extent and type of use of ChatGPT in community pharmacy and to identify concerns and opportunities for pharmacy practice. Methods: A questionnaire was developed, tested and distributed to professionals that work in community pharmacy. The answers were analysed descriptively using frequency tables. Results: Of all participants ( Conclusions: This research shows that using ChatGPT as a writing assistant is valuable and can free up time. Although clinical questions seem promising, ChatGPT's answers are currently too unreliable and do not meet the required quality standards for good pharmaceutical care. If ChatGPT is used to answer clinical questions, crossreferencing with reliable sources is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.