Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026318›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2025

Impact of systemic anticancer therapy timing on cancer vaccine immunogenicity: a review.

Igor Gomez-Randulfe, Helen Lavender, Stefan Symeonides, Fiona Blackhall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Igor Gomez-RandulfeDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5364-2491
Helen LavenderCentre for Drug Development, Cancer Research UK, Oxford, UK.
Stefan SymeonidesEdinburgh Cancer Centre, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-9314
Fiona BlackhallDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic cancer vaccines aim to generate a robust immune response against tumour-associated antigens (TAAs) or tumour-specific antigens. While their safety is well established, their efficacy as monotherapy remains limited due to factors such as self-tolerance to TAAs and the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Combining cancer vaccines with systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) offers a promising strategy to improve efficacy. However, the optimal timing and combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy to enhance immunogenicity are not yet fully understood. This review aims to assess the evidence regarding the immunogenicity of antiviral and anticancer vaccines when combined with SACTs, including chemotherapy and ICIs, with a particular focus on the timing of vaccine administration relative to SACT. Additionally, we evaluate the impact of steroids on immunogenicity. Our findings suggest that the timing of vaccine administration is critical, with improved immunogenic responses observed when vaccines are administered at nadir (15 days post-chemotherapy). Certain chemotherapies, such as low-dose metronomic cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel, demonstrate potential for immunomodulation, enhancing T-cell responses when combined with vaccines. Conversely, steroids may reduce immunogenicity. The combination of ICIs with cancer vaccines shows evidence of a synergistic effect, with concurrent administration generally yielding better outcomes than sequential approaches. Prospective trials exploring various timings and sequences are essential to optimize the efficacy of anticancer vaccines.

Indexed as

cancer vaccineschemotherapyimmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunogenicitysystemic anticancer therapiesvaccine timing

Identifiers

PMID40026318
PMCPMC11869303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.