ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Deep Learning Models for Predicting the Recurrence of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Data-Based Machine Learning Web Calculator for Predicting Recurrence in Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Prolactin-Linked Plasma Cell-Macrophage Immune Phenotype in Synchronous Bilateral Plasma Cell Mastitis: A Two-Center Prediction Study with Tissue Correspondence.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Comprehensive immune profiling identifies alterations in adaptive and innate immune responses in granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients in remission.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Constructing a predictive model for acute mastitis in lactating women based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a rare chronic inflammatory breast disease that presents significant challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Predicting the recurrence of IGM is crucial for effective patient management and improved treatment outcomes. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of different machine learning models, including logistic regression, random forest, and neural networks, in predicting IGM recurrence using patient data. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 212 patients diagnosed with IGM. Collected data included comprehensive serological markers, tumor characteristics, and treatment history. The dataset was divided into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%). Data preprocessing involved normalization, feature selection, and data augmentation to ensure model robustness. Three predictive models were developed and compared: logistic regression, random forest, and neural networks. Performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate each model's ability to predict IGM recurrence. Results: The logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.837, 0.725 and 0.829 in the training cohort, validation cohort and test cohort. The random forest model showed improved performance with an AUC of 0.797, 0.755 and 0.793 in the training cohort, validation cohort and test cohort. The neural network model outperformed both the logistic regression and random forest models, with an AUC of 0.938, 0.880 and 0.913 and a better F1 score. Feature importance analysis indicated that variables such as smoking, surgery and a history of oral contraceptive use were most important in predicting recurrence. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that, compared to logistic regression and random forest models, neural networks have superior performance in predicting the recurrence of granulomatous mastitis. The high accuracy and reliability of the neural network model highlight its potential clinical application in the early and accurate prediction of IGM recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.