Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026263›Full record

SynthesisThe International journal of eating disorders2025

Mental Health Impacts of Self-Help Interventions for the Treatment and Prevention of Eating Disorders. A Meta-Analysis.

Jake Linardon, Hannah K Jarman, Claudia Liu, Cleo Anderson, Zoe McClure, Mariel Messer

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The International journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Design, Implement, Sustain: Advancing Program-Led Interventions for Binge Eating, a Narrative Review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Frequency, Correlates, and Symptom Severity of Eating Disorders Among College Students in Mexico.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gender differences in eating disorders.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jake LinardonSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4475-7139
Hannah K JarmanSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Claudia LiuSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Cleo AndersonSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1203-5492
Zoe McClureSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3926-8058
Mariel MesserSEED Lifespan Strategic Research Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7186-7264

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1196948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSelf-help programs are recommended as a first step in the management of eating disorders. Yet, whether self-help interventions have broader mental health benefits beyond symptom and risk reduction remains unclear. As randomized controlled trials (RCTs) also assess general mental health secondary to eating disorder symptoms, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate whether and to what extent pure self-help interventions for eating disorders produce improvements in these secondary outcomes.

methodTwenty-seven RCTs of pure self-help interventions for the prevention or treatment of eating disorders were included. Mean age ranged from 16 to 46 years. Most self-help interventions were based on cognitive-behavioral therapy. Most interventions were delivered via digital means (Internet, apps, etc.). Random effects meta-analyses were conducted on six outcomes: depression, anxiety, general distress, quality of life, self-esteem, and psychosocial impairment. Analyses were stratified based on pre-selected (at risk/symptomatic) and clinical samples.

resultsFor pre-selected samples (k = 18), significant pooled effects favoring self-help over controls were observed for depression (g = 0.24), anxiety (g = 0.23), distress (g = 0.23) and self-esteem (g = 0.18). Effects remained robust when adjusting for risk of bias. Non-significant effects were observed for quality of life and impairment. Crucially, > 80% of trials on pre-selected samples delivered a waitlist control. For clinical samples (k = 9), significant pooled effects favoring self-help were found for distress (g = 0.39), impairment (g = 0.39), and quality of life (g = 0.29), although these results should be interpreted with caution as the number of studies was low.

conclusionSelf-help interventions produce small improvements in those mental health symptoms that are typically comorbid with eating disorders.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersMental HealthSelf CareAdolescentAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf ConceptYoung AdultCBTeating disordersmeta‐analysisrandomized controlled trialstreatment

Identifiers

PMID40026263
PMCPMC12067516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.