ArticleMuscle & nerve2025
Myostatin Knockout Mice Have Larger Muscle Fibers With Normal Function and Morphology.
Article in Muscle & nerve, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myostatin Orchestrates miR-124-Mediated Epigenetic Silencing ofBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Methodological framing in muscle morphology and mechanics: aligning experimental protocols with scientific questions.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2026Review
- Myostatin deficiency blunts mechanical adaptation of soleus muscle to overload.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2025Article
- Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Exercise-Induced Muscle-Fat Crosstalk: Molecular Mediators and Their Pharmacological Modulation for the Maintenance of Metabolic Flexibility in Aging.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Inhibiting Myostatin Expression by the Antisense Oligonucleotides Improves Muscle Wasting in a Chronic Kidney Disease Mouse Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Osteosarcopenia: key molecular mechanisms and translational perspectives.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe assessed whether muscle fibers in myostatin knockout (MSTN-/-) mice are just larger or also exhibit morphological, metabolic, and functional differences from MSTN+/+ mice.
methodsWe compared single fiber contractile properties and histological fiber properties in muscles from MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice.
resultsEven though in permeabilized muscle fibers from the extensor digitorum longus and soleus muscle maximal force was higher (p < 0.001) there were no significant differences in specific power (power per unit volume), specific tension (force per cross-sectional area), maximal shortening velocity, or curvature of the force-velocity relationship between MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice. In histological sections of the soleus muscle, fibers were larger (p < 0.001), but the succinate dehydrogenase staining intensity and capillary density did not differ significantly between MSTN-/- and MSTN+/+ mice, which was explicable by the larger number of capillaries around a fiber (p < 0.001). A model showed no significant differences in soleus muscle oxygenation. DISCUSSION: The larger force-generating capacity of fibers from MSTN-/- mice is explicable by the larger fiber cross-sectional area. The data indicate that muscle fibers from MSTN-/- mice are quantitatively, but not qualitatively different from muscle fibers from MSTN+/+ mice. Myostatin inhibition may help increase muscle mass in conditions accompanied by muscle weakness without a detrimental impact on muscle quality, but systemic side effects need to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.