ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Aging Impacts Basic Auditory and Timing Processes.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain Network Dynamics of Local and Global Predictive Processing in Aging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- FREQ-NESS Reveals Age-Related Differences in Frequency-Resolved Brain Networks During Auditory Recognition and Resting State.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Early Signs of Aging in Auditory Function Reflected in the Event-Related Potentials.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2026Article
- Top-Down Attention Modulates Phase Effects on Audio-Tactile Processing.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Predictive Processing Over the Course of Aging: Multiple Timescales of Effective Connectivity.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Basal ganglia and cerebellar lesions causally impact the neural encoding of temporal regularities.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deterioration in the peripheral and central auditory systems is common in older adults and often leads to hearing and speech comprehension difficulties. Even when hearing remains intact, electrophysiological data of older adults frequently exhibit altered neural responses along the auditory pathway, reflected in variability in phase alignment of neural activity to speech sound onsets. However, it remains unclear whether challenges in speech processing in aging stem from more fundamental deficits in auditory and timing processes. Here, we investigated if and how aging individuals encoded temporal regularities in isochronous auditory sequences presented at 1.5Hz, and if they employed adaptive mechanisms of neural phase alignment in anticipation of next sound onsets. We recorded EEG in older and young individuals listening to simple isochronous tone sequences. We show that aging individuals displayed larger event-related neural responses, an increased 1/F slope, but reduced phase-coherence at the stimulation frequency (1.5Hz) and a reduced slope of phase-coherence over time in the delta and theta frequency-bands. These observations suggest altered top-down modulatory inhibition when processing repeated and predictable sounds in a sequence and altered mechanisms of continuous phase-alignment to expected sound onsets in aging. Given that deteriorations in these basic timing capacities may affect other higher-order cognitive processes (e.g., attention, perception, and action), these results underscore the need for future research examining the link between basic timing abilities and general cognition across the lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.