Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40026205›Full record

ArticleEcology2025

Temperature-dependent responses to light and nutrients in phytoplankton.

Anna Lena Heinrichs, Anika Happe, Apostolos-Manuel Koussoroplis, Helmut Hillebrand, Julian Merder, Maren Striebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna Lena HeinrichsInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9691-4121
Anika HappeInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5843-0708
Apostolos-Manuel KoussoroplisLaboratoire Microorganismes Genome et Environnement (LMGE), UMR CNRS 6023, Université Clermont Auvergne, Aubière Cedex, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5218-5604
Helmut HillebrandInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-1613
Julian MerderDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-7016
Maren StriebelInstitute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment (ICBM), Carl-von-Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, School of Mathematics and Science, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-2154

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft STR 1383/8-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrients and light are major resources controlling growth, biomass, and community structure of phytoplankton. When looking at those resources individually, resource uptake and biochemical transformation, and thereby also the demand for resources, have been shown to be temperature-dependent. However, there is still a lack of understanding of how temperature controls the response to multiple resources, although simultaneous limitation by multiple resources is common for single species and whole communities. We conducted a multifactorial, gradient-design experiment growing four freshwater phytoplankton species under 125 combinations of temperature, light, and nutrients (5 × 5 × 5 levels). In three of four species, we found evidence for an interactive effect of light and nutrients on growth that was modulated by temperature. The effect of high-level supply of both resources on algal growth rate generally exceeded the sum of their individual effects. Conversely, the lowest growth rates occurred not necessarily at the lowest level of both resources but at the most extreme light:nutrient supply ratios (either only light or nutrients were at highest supply level but the other resource remained at low supply). These interactive light-nutrient effects were modulated by temperature, resulting in highest growth rates when both resources and temperature were highest. Our study demonstrates that temperature modulates the magnitude of the interactive light-nutrient effect on phytoplankton growth. Consequently, these findings highlight the importance of considering temperature to understand the limitation by multiple resources and show that growth responses would be over- or underestimated when these interactions are not taken into account. Our results provide a first indication that the resource-dependent growth of phytoplankton will change in a warming world when considering multiple resources.

Indexed as

LightNutrientsPhytoplanktonTemperatureNutrientsgradient designgrowthinteractive‐effectslight:nutrient ratioresource limitationtemperature dependence

Identifiers

PMID40026205
PMCPMC11874050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.