Trial reportBipolar disorders2025
Impact of Activation Therapy for Inpatients With Major Depression: Primary and Secondary Outcomes From a Randomised Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Bipolar disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting Cognitive Change During Treatment for Inpatient Depression: Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInpatient depression is associated with high morbidity and significant cognitive impairment. Inpatient treatment often focuses on short-term stabilization with medication. Readmission rates are high. We examined the impact of a novel psychological intervention, activation therapy (AT, Behavioural Activation combined with Cognitive Activation), versus treatment as usual (TAU) on readmission rates, and cognitive, functional, and depression outcomes, in inpatient depression.
methodA randomised controlled trial in adults hospitalised with a major depressive episode. Inpatients were randomised to AT (8 individual sessions over 2 weeks) or not (TAU). Key time points were baseline (on admission) and 14 weeks after baseline. The primary outcome was psychiatric hospital readmission rates within 12 weeks of discharge. Secondary outcomes were cognition, general functioning, depression, and 'deactivation' symptoms (change from baseline to 14 weeks).
resultsNinety-seven individuals were randomised to AT (n = 47) or TAU (n = 50). Readmission rates did not differ between treatment arms (34% vs. 40%; OR = 0.76, CI = 0.30-1.90). Significant improvements for verbal learning and memory (d = 0.42) and general functioning (d = 0.58) were in favour of the AT versus TAU arms. Per protocol analysis showed additional significant effects of AT on psychomotor speed (d = 0.64) and clinician-rated depression symptoms (d = 0.56). No significant effects were observed for other secondary outcomes (subjective cognition, self-reported depression symptoms, and deactivation symptoms).
conclusionsThe AT intervention showed durable, pro-cognitive effects. Further adaptations of AT, such as the addition of maintenance sessions as patients transition to community-based care, need exploring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.