Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025964›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

Epidemiologic Studies of Biomarkers and Their Role in Carcinogenesis: The Need for a Formal Causal Inference Approach.

Frances E M Albers, S Ghazaleh Dashti, Brigid M Lynch

Abstract readEditorialComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frances E M AlbersCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7319-5182
S Ghazaleh DashtiClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1399-7220
Brigid M LynchCancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8060-547X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, Brantley and colleagues investigated the relationships between estrogen metabolites and postmenopausal breast cancer, using data from a nested case-control study within the Nurses' Health Study. One study aim was to investigate the extent to which estrogen metabolism patterns provided further insights into mechanisms in breast cancer development beyond the role of estradiol. In this editorial, we describe the challenges in interpreting results from observational studies of biomarkers and their role in carcinogenesis due to: (i) a general lack of clarity in the research question, (ii) the limits of current knowledge about the complex underlying causal structure involving interrelated biomarkers, and (iii) the limitations in existing data sources (e.g., biomarkers measured at a single time point). We propose that applying a formal causal inference framework in these studies could be a step forward in improving their rigor, by enabling researchers to be more explicit about the causal effects of interest and the assumptions made, and to advocate for the improvement of future studies. See related article by Brantley et al., p. 375.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisCase-Control StudiesCausalityEpidemiologic StudiesFemaleHumansBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.