Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025846›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2025

Population Pharmacokinetic and Exposure-Response Analyses for Ponatinib in the Phase 3 PhALLCON Study.

Michael J Hanley, Thomas R Larson, Paul M Diderichsen, Anna Largajolli, Katrina Hui, Jaydeep Srimani, Bingxia Wang, Alexander Vorog, Neeraj Gupta

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03589326 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Ponatinib Versus Imatinib, Administered in Combination With Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy, in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03589326 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Multicenter Study Comparing Ponatinib Versus Imatinib, Administered in Combination With Reduced-Intensity Chemotherapy, in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTakedaRan2018 to 2027Enrolled245ConditionsPhiladelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ALL)ArmsPonatinib, Imatinib, Vincristine, Dexamethasone, Cytarabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael J HanleyTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-2797
Thomas R LarsonTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7439-9948
Paul M DiderichsenCertara, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3567-7903
Anna LargajolliCertara, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-5567
Katrina HuiCertara, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jaydeep SrimaniTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Bingxia WangTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexander VorogTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Neeraj GuptaTakeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-5218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In March 2024, ponatinib received accelerated FDA approval for the treatment of newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL) in combination with chemotherapy based on the Phase 3 PhALLCON study (NCT03589326), which demonstrated a higher rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remission (CR) at the end of induction (EOI) with ponatinib (34.4%) versus imatinib (16.7%; p = 0.002). Patients received ponatinib (30 mg QD with reduction to 15 mg QD upon achievement of MRD-negative CR at EOI) or imatinib (600 mg QD) combined with 20 cycles of reduced-intensity chemotherapy (induction: 3 cycles; consolidation: 6 cycles; and maintenance: 11 cycles). Ponatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) were similar in patients in PhALLCON and patients in a previous population PK analysis. Bayesian re-estimation of the previously developed population PK model adequately described PhALLCON PK data. Exposure-efficacy analyses did not identify a significant relationship between ponatinib exposure and the probability of MRD-negative CR at EOI (p = 0.619), suggesting a consistent efficacy benefit across exposures. Ponatinib exposure was not a significant predictor of arterial occlusive events, venous thromboembolic events, thrombocytopenia, or lipase increase (p > 0.05). However, higher exposures were associated with a higher probability of hypertension (p = 0.0340) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase (p = 0.0034). Dose reduction from 30 to 15 mg was predicted to decrease the odds of experiencing hypertension by 37.7% and ALT increase by 44.2%. Collectively, exposure-response analyses support a favorable benefit-risk profile of the approved ponatinib dosage (30 mg QD reduced to 15 mg QD upon achievement of MRD-negative CR at EOI), combined with chemotherapy, for frontline treatment of Ph + ALL.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsImidazolesPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPyridazinesAdolescentAdultAgedBayes TheoremFemaleHumansImatinib MesylateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualPhiladelphia ChromosomeRemission InductionImatinib MesylateImidazolesponatinibPyridazinesdose–responseoncologypharmacokineticspharmacometricspopulation PK‐PD

Identifiers

PMID40025846
PMCPMC11873365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.