ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Prescription patterns demonstrate high demand for treating erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeRadical prostatectomy can cause erectile dysfunction; however, subsequent treatment with, e.g., phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors may improve sexual function in the patients. We aim to examine prescriptions for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy and to identify factors that may affect the prescription rate. PATIENTS AND
methodsA study based on men included in the Danish Prostate Registry (DanProst) in 1995-2021, and information on prescriptions for erectile dysfunction (ATC: G04BE) from the Danish Prescription Registry. We calculated the proportion of prescriptions per month from 1 year before to 2 years after the initial biopsy and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of having a prescription.
resultsWe included 9,286 men with radical prostatectomy, 4,221 men managed on active surveillance, and 47,572 men with nonmalignant biopsies for comparison. The proportion of prescriptions increased significantly after biopsy among men with radical prostatectomy compared to men with nonmalignant biopsies and active surveillance. Patients with prior prescriptions for erectile dysfunction had an OR of 3.49 (95% CI, 2.98-4.08) of new prescriptions 6 months after the initial biopsy. Compared to patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing surgery, patients with unilateral nerve-sparing surgery had an OR of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.06-1.43), whereas patients without nerve-sparing surgery had an OR of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.46).
interpretationThe observed patterns of prescriptions demonstrate a high demand for the treatment of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy. The group of prostate cancer survivors is large, and, thus, a strong clinical focus on managing erectile dysfunction is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.