ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Comparison of Decompression vs Enucleation Using Fractal Analysis with Panoramic Radiography for Odontogenic Cysts.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Odontogenic cysts cause a decrease in bone trabeculation. This retrospective study of 37 patients with odontogenic cysts aimed to compare outcomes from treatment by decompression (marsupialization) versus enucleation, including the degree of trabeculation evaluated by fractal analysis (FA) using panoramic radiography (OPG). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 37 patients diagnosed with odontogenic cysts between January 2012 and January 2024 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on treatment: enucleation or decompression. Bone healing was assessed by the FA method, expressed as fractal dimension. The measurement times were defined as baseline (T0), 3 months postoperatively (T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2). Statistical analyses were performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test and the t test for intergroup comparisons. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS A total of 37 patients were included in the study (mean age: 30.43±17.8 years), of whom 21 underwent decompression and 16 underwent enucleation. The mean FA values at T0, T1, and T2 for both groups demonstrated an increase in trabecular bone complexity over time. However, no statistically significant difference was found in bone healing between the enucleation and decompression groups at 3 months or at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study indicate that both approaches lead to trabecular bone recovery over time, with no statistically significant difference in bone healing at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. FA is a valuable method for assessing the skeletal effects of enucleation and marsupialization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.