Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025665›Full record

Trial reportMedicine and science in sports and exercise2025

Training Parameters and Adaptations That Mediate Walking Capacity Gains from High-Intensity Gait Training Poststroke.

Pierce Boyne, Allison Miller, Sarah M Schwab-Farrell, Heidi Sucharew, Daniel Carl, Sandra A Billinger, Darcy S Reisman

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pierce BoyneDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Allison Miller
Sarah M Schwab-FarrellDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Heidi SucharewDepartment of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Daniel CarlDepartment of Rehabilitation, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Sandra A Billinger
Darcy S ReismanDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.

Funding

High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: HIT-Stroke Trial 2R01HD093694 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Pierce Boyne · 2018 to 2026
$6.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD093694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLocomotor high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to improve walking capacity (speed and endurance) more than moderate-intensity aerobic training (MAT) after stroke, but it is unclear which training parameter(s) should be prioritized (e.g., speed, heart rate, blood lactate, step count) and to what extent walking capacity gains are the result of gait changes versus cardiorespiratory adaptations. This study aimed to assess which training parameters and longitudinal adaptations most strongly mediate 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) gains from poststroke HIIT.

methodsThe HIT-Stroke Trial randomized 55 persons with chronic stroke and walking limitations to HIIT or MAT, each involving overground and treadmill walking, 45 min, 3 times per week for 12 wk. HIIT used short maximum speed intervals, targeting >60% heart rate reserve (HRR). MAT targeted 40%-60% HRR. Blinded outcomes included 6MWD, short-distance gait function (e.g., fastest 10-m gait speed), and aerobic capacity (e.g., ventilatory threshold). This ancillary analysis used structural equation models to compare mediating effects of different training parameters and longitudinal adaptations on 6MWD changes.

resultsNet gains in 6MWD from HIIT versus MAT were primarily mediated by faster training speeds (+57 m, P < 0.0001) and longitudinal gait adaptations (+37 m, P = 0.0005). Training step count was also positively associated with 6MWD gains but was lower with HIIT versus MAT, which decreased the net 6MWD gain from HIIT (-14 m, P = 0.02). HIIT generated higher training heart rate and lactate than MAT, but aerobic capacity gains were similar between groups, and 6MWD changes were not associated with training heart rate, training lactate, or aerobic adaptations.

conclusionsTo increase walking capacity with poststroke HIIT, training speed and step count appear to be the most important parameters to prioritize.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGaitHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingStroke RehabilitationWalkingAgedFemaleHeart RateHumansLactic AcidMaleMiddle AgedWalking SpeedWalk TestLactic AcidAEROBIC EXERCISEHIITINTERVALLOCOMOTIONNEUROMUSCULARTREADMILL

Identifiers

PMID40025665
PMCPMC13159380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.