Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025613›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2025

Ghrelin promotes neurologic recovery and neurogenesis in the chronic phase after experimental stroke.

Carolin Beuker, Ulrike Schreiner, Jan-Kolja Strecker, Elena Altach, Verena Rätzel, Antje Schmidt-Pogoda, Heinz Wiendl, Jens Minnerup, Kai Diederich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carolin BeukerDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany. carolin.beuker@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3495-0357
Ulrike SchreinerDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Jan-Kolja StreckerDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Elena AltachDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Verena RätzelDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Antje Schmidt-PogodaDepartment of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Heinz WiendlClinic of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Jens Minnerup *Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Kai Diederich *Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neuroprotective and proangiogenic potential of ghrelin in acute ischemic stroke has been demonstrated in experimental studies. However, the transferability of these results is limited as ghrelin was administered either before or very early after stroke onset and follow-up was limited to the first days after stroke. The aim of this study was therefore to close and extend this knowledge gap. To this end, we investigated the effect of ghrelin in two different translational animal models, one investigating acute and one investigating long-term structural and functional recovery after experimental stroke.

methodsMiddle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) or photothrombotic stroke was induced in 65 adult male Wistar rats. Eleven sham-operated animals served as controls. The rats were treated with either ghrelin, the ghrelin receptor antagonist [D-Lys]-GHRP-6 or a control substance. Up to four weeks after ischemia, behavioral tests such as the cylinder test, the tape removal test, and the rotarod test were performed to examine sensorimotor deficits, and the Morris water maze was performed to examine effects on the acquisition and consolidation of new memories. The structural outcome was determined by a differential analysis of neurogenesis in relation to survival and proliferation of newborn neurons in the post-ischemic brain, angiogenesis and determination of infarct size.

resultsGhrelin treatment improved motor and somatosensory functions and preserved the consolidation of new memories after photothrombotic stroke. As a structural correlate, long-term survival and sustained proliferation of neuronal cells after stroke was significantly increased in ghrelin-treated rats, while angiogenesis remained unaffected. In contrast to these neuroregenerative mechanisms, ghrelin did not induce immediate neuroprotective effects after MCAO.

conclusionsOur results suggest that ghrelin has a significant pro-neuroregenerative effect by enhancing long-term survival and sustained proliferation of neurons in the dentate gyrus and peri-infarct area, thus promoting functional recovery. Overall, ghrelin represents a promising target in the subacute and chronic phase after ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

GhrelinNeurogenesisRegenerationStroke

Identifiers

PMID40025613
PMCPMC11921976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.