Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025583›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2025

Brief communication: attitudes and preferences of long-acting injectable HIV preexposure prophylaxis among Thai adolescents and young adults.

Alisa Wongsethanatada, Wipaporn Natalie Songtaweesin, Prissana Wongharn, Juthamanee Moonwong, Sasiprapha Khamthi, Lucksanapon Pitikawinwong, Thanyawee Puthanakit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alisa WongsethanatadaFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wipaporn Natalie SongtaweesinSchool of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. wipaporn.n@chula.ac.th.
Prissana WongharnCenter of Excellence for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Bangkok, Thailand.
Juthamanee MoonwongCenter of Excellence for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sasiprapha KhamthiCenter of Excellence for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Bangkok, Thailand.
Lucksanapon PitikawinwongCenter of Excellence for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thanyawee PuthanakitCenter of Excellence for Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to explore willingness to use and preference for long-acting injectable PrEP (LAI-PrEP) among Thai youth at risk of HIV. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 100 Thai youth aged 18 to 24 years attending a sexual health clinic in Bangkok, Thailand. Participants received information about oral and LAI-PrEP before completing a questionnaire. Of the 98 participants willing to use pre-exposure prophylaxis, 47 preferred the injectable form. Preference for the injectable form was higher among individuals not currently using oral pre-exposure prophylaxis, affordability and longer injection intervals were key for acceptance of long-acting injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsPatient PreferencePre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInjectionsMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSoutheast Asian PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesThailandYoung AdultAnti-HIV AgentsAdolescentsHIVLong-actingMen who have sex with menPreferencePrEPYouth

Identifiers

PMID40025583
PMCPMC11872299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.