Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025579›Full record

SynthesisBMC global and public health2025

Children and young people at the intersection of chronic illness and migration: a scoping review.

Brenda Agyeiwaa Poku, Lucy Hunt, Alison Pilnick, Karl Michael Atkin, Catrin Evans, Emily Pulsford, Susan Kirk

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brenda Agyeiwaa PokuSchool of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. brenda.poku@nottingham.ac.uk.
Lucy HuntSchool of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Alison PilnickSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Karl Michael AtkinDepartment of Sociology, University of York, York, UK.
Catrin EvansThe Nottingham Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Emily PulsfordSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Susan KirkDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic illnesses (CIs) are increasingly prevalent among children/young people (CYP) globally. For migrant CYP with CIs, achieving a stable life in a new country can be particularly challenging due to additional barriers such as cultural and language differences, unsafe living conditions, and discrimination. While migration can sometimes improve healthcare access by introducing new models of care and ways of understanding health, these advantages are often outweighed by obstacles that hinder access to essential services. This review aimed to map the global evidence on post-migration experiences and outcomes of CYP with CIs and to identify priorities for research, policy, and practice to improve their care.

methodsA scoping review was conducted following JBI guidelines. We searched seven online databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Social Science Collection, and Web of Science, up to February 2024. Data were synthesised using a socio-ecological model, and four young migrants living with sickle cell disease in the UK contributed to the review through a Patient and Public Involvement Advisory Group.

resultsOf the 58 included papers, most focused on migration to high-income countries, particularly the USA, and used institutional records or case studies. Few studies provided detailed information about migration status or reason for migration, often using proxies like parental country of birth or language spoken. The socio-ecological model revealed disparities in health status, treatment access, and health outcomes for migrant CYP with CIs. Key challenges were language, communication, costs, bureaucracy, family dynamics, coordination issues, resource constraints, and socio-political influences. Significant gaps included a lack of intersectional analyses (e.g. accounting for 'race' and citizenship) and limited qualitative research capturing the lived experiences of migrant CYP with CIs.

conclusionsMigrant CYP with CIs face significant health disparities shaped by individual, social, and systemic factors. Addressing these challenges requires intersectional and qualitative research, alongside collaboration with policymakers, practitioners, and communities, to inform more equitable healthcare policies and practices.

Indexed as

ChildrenChronic illnessIntersectionalityMigrationScoping reviewYoung people

Identifiers

PMID40025579
PMCPMC11874703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.