Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025554›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2025

Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol.

Rie Yamada, Kaori Futakawa, Kuangzhe Xu, Satoshi Kondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rie YamadaDepartment of Adult Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, 2630aq , Toyama-Shi, Toyama-Ken, Sugitani, 930-0194, Japan. darie@med.u-toyama.ac.jp.ORCID 0009-0002-7564-2932
Kaori FutakawaDepartment of Maternal Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, 2630aq , Toyama-Shi, Toyama-Ken, Sugitani, 930-0194, Japan.
Kuangzhe XuInstitute for Promotion of Higher Education, Hirosaki University, 1 Bunkyo-Cho, Hirosaki-Shi, Aomori-Ken, 036-8560, Japan.
Satoshi KondoDepartment of Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Toyama,2630aq , Toyama-Shi, Toyama-Ken, Sugitani, 930-0194, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmpathy is a crucial skill that enhances the quality of patient care, reduces burnout among healthcare professionals, and fosters professionalism in medical students. Clinical practice and standardized patient-based education provide opportunities to enhance empathy, but a lack of consistency and reproducibility as well as significant dependency on resources are impediments. The COVID-19 pandemic has further restricted these opportunities, highlighting the need for alternative approaches. Virtual patients through standardized scenarios ensure consistency and reproducibility while offering safe, flexible, and repetitive learning opportunities unconstrained by time or location. Empathy education using virtual patients could serve as a temporary alternative during the COVID-19 pandemic and address the limitations of traditional face-to-face learning methods. This review aims to comprehensively map existing literature on the use of virtual patients in empathy education and identify research gaps.

methodsThis scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute's guidelines and be reported according to PRISMA-P. The search strategy includes a comprehensive search across databases such as PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, Google, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar, covering both published and gray literature without language restrictions. Both quantitative and qualitative studies will be included. Two independent researchers will screen all titles/abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Data will be extracted to summarize definitions of empathy, characteristics of virtual patient scenarios, and methods for measuring their impact on empathy development. Results will be presented in narrative and tabular formats to highlight key findings and research gaps. DISCUSSION: As this review analyzes existing literature, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be actively disseminated through academic conferences and peer-reviewed publications, providing educators and researchers with valuable insights into the potential of virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical education. This study goes beyond the mere synthesis of academic knowledge by contributing to the advancement of medical education and clinical practice by clarifying virtual patient scenario design and evaluation methods in empathy education. The findings provide a critical foundation for our ongoing development of a medical education platform aimed at enhancing empathy through the use of virtual patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, MedicalEmpathyPatient SimulationStudents, MedicalHumansScoping Reviews as TopicEmpathyMedicalScoping reviewStudentsVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40025554
PMCPMC11871709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.