Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025552›Full record

ReviewMalaria journal2025

Assessing fitness costs in malaria parasites: a comprehensive review and implications for drug resistance management.

Xyonane Segovia, Bhavya Srivastava, Sergio Serrato-Arroyo, Ashley Guerrero, Silvie Huijben

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Competitive suppression and release in artemisinin-resistantEvolution, medicine, and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Towards an evolutionary baseline model ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xyonane SegoviaThe Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Bhavya SrivastavaUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sergio Serrato-ArroyoThe Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Ashley GuerreroThe Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
Silvie HuijbenThe Center for Evolution and Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA. shuijben@asu.edu.

Funding

NSF 2047572 and 2052363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) remains a broadly effective anti-malarial drug combination, but the emergence of resistance is threatening its effectiveness. Limiting the spread of these drug-resistant parasites and delaying the emergence of resistance in new areas are of high priority. Understanding the evolution of resistance relies on discerning the fitness costs and benefits associated with resistance mutations. If the cost associated with resistance in an untreated host is sufficiently large relative to the benefit of resistance in a treated host, then the spread of resistance can be mitigated by ensuring sufficient hosts free from that active pharmaceutical ingredient. There is no straightforward way to measure these fitness costs, and each approach that has been used has its limitations. Here, the evidence of fitness costs as measured using field data, animal models, and in vitro models is reviewed for three of the main current or past first-line treatments for malaria: chloroquine (CQ), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), and artemisinin derivatives (ART). Despite the difficulties of assessing fitness costs, there is a good amount of evidence of fitness costs in drug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum parasites. The most persuasive evidence comes from resistance reversal observed following the cessation of the use of chloroquine. Comparable evidence cannot be obtained for SP- and ART-resistant parasites, due to the absence of complete cessation of these drugs in the field. Data from in vitro and animal models are variable. While fitness costs are often observed, their presence is not universal across all resistant strains. The extent and nature of these fitness costs can vary greatly depending on the specific genetic factors involved and the ecological context in which the parasites evolve. As a result, it is essential to avoid making broad generalizations about the prevalence or impact of fitness costs in drug-resistant malaria parasites. Focusing on fitness costs as a vulnerability in resistant parasites can guide their evolutionary trajectory towards minimizing their fitness. By accurately predicting these costs, efforts to extend the effectiveness of anti-malarials can be enhanced, limiting resistance evolution and advancing malaria control and elimination goals.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsDrug ResistanceGenetic FitnessPlasmodium falciparumAnimalsArtemisininsHumansAntimalarialsArtemisininsDhfrDhpsFitness costsIn vitrokelch13MalariaPfcrtPlasmodium falciparumResistance managementRodent model

Identifiers

PMID40025552
PMCPMC11871665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.