Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025511›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2025

Unveiling developmental delays in early childhood: insights from a comparative study of the Bayley Scales (BSID-III) and the ASQ-3 in Iran.

Mehran Karimi, Alireza Emarati, Zahra Nafei, Farimah Shamsi, Niloofar Gashty Mazar, Elahe Akbarian

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehran KarimiChildren Growth Disorder Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7987-6694
Alireza EmaratiChildren Growth Disorder Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-6381-7013
Zahra NafeiChildren Growth Disorder Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8714-2201
Farimah ShamsiCenter for Healthcare Data Modeling, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8812-0765
Niloofar Gashty MazarChildren Growth Disorder Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Elahe AkbarianChildren Growth Disorder Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. akbarian.elahe@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7485-0567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDevelopmental delay in early childhood is a significant concern with multifaceted causes and implications. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III) is widely used for developmental assessment, but its use in Iranian children has been understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the developmental delays of Iranian children aged 1 to 42 months, investigate the association between parental education and these developmental outcomes, and compare developmental outcomes between the BSID-III and the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, Third Edition (ASQ-3). These findings contribute to informing clinical practices, policy makers, and early intervention programs aimed at promoting optimal development for all children.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 707 Iranian children from Yazd, Iran, with suspected developmental delays were recruited from two health centers. Trained examiners administered the Persian-adapted and validated version of the BSID-III following standardized procedures. We hypothesized differences in BSID-III scores compared to normative samples, considering age, gender, and parental education. Additionally, comparisons between BSID-III scores and the validated Iranian version of ASQ-3 outcomes were explored to gain further insights.

resultsThe study sample exhibited varying rates of developmental delays across Cognitive (15.8%), Receptive Communication (20.1%), Expressive Communication (18.4%), Fine Motor (13.6%) and Gross Motor (15.7%) domains. Additionally, Age-related differences were observed, particularly in Receptive and Expressive Communication, where older children showed higher rates of delays. Gender differences were also significant in the Language Scale, with females showing slightly higher rates of normal development. Moreover, parental education emerged as a significant factor, with higher levels associated with a reduced occurrence of developmental delays. Furthermore, comparisons between BSID-III results and ASQ-3 outcomes highlighted discrepancies, suggesting an imperfect alignment between measures. The analysis demonstrated fair agreement for Cognitive-Problem Solving and Gross Motor development, but poor agreement for Fine Motor development, highlighting the complexity of developmental assessment and the need for cautious interpretation of test results.

conclusionsThis study enhances our understanding of developmental assessment in Iranian children with suspected delays by emphasizing culturally sensitive adaptations for assessment tools alongside recognizing how parental education influences developmental trajectories. Future research with diverse, longitudinal samples is warranted to gain a more comprehensive picture.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDevelopmental DisabilitiesChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansInfantIranMaleNeuropsychological TestsParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesASQ-3Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler DevelopmentChild DevelopmentDevelopmental DelayEarly Childhood

Identifiers

PMID40025511
PMCPMC11871655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.