ArticleBMC biology2025
CTCF-mediated insulation and chromatin environment modulate Car5b escape from X inactivation.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- GenoME: a MoE-based generative model for individualized, multimodal prediction and perturbation of genomic profiles.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Deep learning enabled prediction of nuclear lamina-associated chromatin.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Escape from X-chromosome inactivation: from gene discovery to regulatory mechanisms.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- The impact of X chromosome inactivation on human health.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Epigenetic regulation of cardiac physiology and pathophysiology: biological sex matters.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2026Article
- Direction and modality of transcription changes caused by TAD boundary disruption in Slc29a3/Unc5b locus depends on tissue-specific epigenetic context.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2025Article
- CTCF-mediated insulation and chromatin environment modulate Car5b escape from X inactivation.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenes that escape X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in female somatic cells vary in number and levels of escape among mammalian species and tissues, potentially contributing to species- and tissue-specific sex differences. CTCF, a master chromatin conformation regulator, is enriched at escape regions and may play an important role in regulating escape, but the molecular mechanisms remain elusive.
resultsCTCF binding profiles and epigenetic features were systematically examined at escape genes (escapees) using mouse allelic systems with skewed XCI to distinguish the inactive X (Xi) and active X (Xa) chromosomes. We found that six constitutive and two facultative escapees are located inside 30-800 kb domains marked by convergent arrays of CTCF binding sites, consistent with the formation of chromatin loops. Facultative escapees show clear differences in CTCF binding depending on their XCI status in specific cell types/tissues. In addition, sets of strong and in some cases divergent CTCF binding sites located at the boundary between an escapee and its adjacent neighbors subject to XCI would also help insulate domains. Indeed, deletion but not inversion of a CTCF binding site at the boundary between the facultative escapee Car5b and its silent neighbor Siah1b results in a dramatic reduction of Car5b escape. This is associated with reduced CTCF and cohesin binding, which indicates loss of looping and insulation and is supported by 3C combined with Hi-C analysis. In addition, enrichment in the repressive mark H3K27me3 invades the Car5b domain in deleted cells, consistent with loss of expression from the Xi. In contrast, cells with an inversion of the CTCF binding site retain CTCF and cohesin binding, as well as looping, in line with persistence of escape. Interestingly, the levels of escape increase in cells with deletion of either Dxz4, which disrupts the Xi-specific compact 3D structure, or Firre, which results in lower H3K27me3 enrichment on the Xi, indicating that the structural and epigenetic features of the Xi constrain escape from XCI in wild type conditions.
conclusionsTaken together, our findings support the idea that escape from XCI in female somatic cells is modulated by both the topological insulation of domains via CTCF binding and the surrounding heterochromatin environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.