ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Long-Term Experience with Luspatercept in Relapsed/Refractory Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Chinese Real-World Study.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Real-World Luspatercept Evidence in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.Hematological oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Luspatercept: From Bench to Bedside and Beyond in the Management of Ineffective Erythropoiesis.Journal of hematology · 2026Review
- [Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of myelodysplastic neoplasms (2026)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
- Baseline erythropoietin level predicts Luspatercept response in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: a propensity score-matched analysis.Leukemia research reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLuspatercept has been shown to be efficacious for patients with relapsed or refractory lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (LR-MDS) in both clinical trials and real-world studies. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up data in real-world settings remain scarce, particularly in Asia.
methodsData from patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory LR-MDS who had been treated with luspatercept at our center between June 2022 and May 2024 were retrospectively collected.
resultsIn total, 60 patients were included in this study (63.4% males). The median duration of luspatercept exposure was 9 (range 3-25) months, and the median follow-up time was 15 (range 3-26) months. The hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E) rate was 46.7%, 51.0%, 48.6%, and 43.3% at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months, and at the end of follow-up, respectively. Among patients who were transfusion-dependent prior to luspatercept, 48.3%, 38.7%, and 25.8% achieved transfusion independence for 8, 12, and 16 weeks or longer at the 6th month. Over time, patients treated with luspatercept had a significant increase in hemoglobin level compared with that of the baseline from the 1st month to the end of follow-up (all P < 0.05). At the end of follow-up, 5 of 32 (15.6%) patients who had response had experienced a relapse, 1 patient (1.7%) had progressed to higher-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS), and 2 patients (3.3%) had progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. Three patients (5.0%) died of pulmonary infection. Serum erythropoietin (EPO) ≤ 500 IU/l at baseline was the only independent predictive factor for HI-E at the 3rd month (P = 0.007).
conclusionLuspatercept is proved efficacious and well tolerated in relapsed/refractory LR-MDS and appears to be beneficial in reducing disease progression and prolonging survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40025395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.