ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Molecular insights into genodermatoses: Genetic findings from 43 patients.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Genetic Disease Through the Skin: Lessons From the UDN.International journal of dermatology · 2026Article
- Genodermatosis among the southwestern Saudi population: The pattern and the need for a premarital genetic screening protocol.Saudi medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genodermatoses, a group of inherited skin disorders, are characterized by significant genetic heterogeneity and clinical variability, often posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, such as whole exome sequencing (WES) and clinical exome sequencing (CES), have transformed the diagnostic landscape by enabling comprehensive genetic analysis. This study aimed to investigate the molecular spectrum and clinical relevance of genetic findings in 43 patients diagnosed with genodermatoses. Demographic, clinical, and molecular data were collected, and genetic testing was performed using the MGI-Seq platform. Variants were analyzed for pathogenicity, zygosity, and novelty. Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (27.9%) and Epidermolysis Bullosa (23.2%) were the most common diagnoses, followed by Ichthyosis (16.2%) and Oculocutaneous Albinism (13.9%). Less frequent conditions included Ectodermal Dysplasia (6.9%) and single cases of Palmoplantar Keratoderma, PTEN Hamartoma Syndrome, Rothmund-Thomson Syndrome, Xeroderma Pigmentosum, and Megaconial Congenital Muscular Dystrophy (each 2.3%). Molecular findings underscored the genetic complexity of genodermatoses, with 42 distinct variants identified across 19 genes. Of these, 13 variants (31%) were novel, expanding the known molecular spectrum. The novel variants were detected in genes including NF1, COL7A1, ITGB4, COL17A1, NIPAL4, ALOX12B, KRT10, ST14, OCA2, and PTEN, highlighting the diagnostic value of comprehensive genetic analysis. The mean age at diagnosis varied significantly among conditions, reflecting the diagnostic challenges and clinical variability of genodermatoses. This study emphasizes the critical role of WES and CES in diagnosing genodermatoses and understanding their molecular basis, which enhances diagnostic accuracy and supports personalized management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40025372What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.