ArticleCVIR endovascular2025
The variable use of heparin through intravenous bolus and flush fluid systems during endovascular stroke treatment, a world-wide survey.
Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe total amount of heparin administered through flush fluids in stroke patients is not considered in recent trials, possibly influencing main results. We investigated the use of heparin among treating physicians worldwide.
methodsWe conducted a survey from November 2022 to January 2023 to identify the variability of heparin administration during stroke endovascular treatment (EVT). We calculated the total heparin dose per hour (IU/h) by adding the intravenous (IV)-bolus dose to the amount administered through flush fluids, calculated by a multiplication of the number of infusion bags, drip rate[mL/h] and heparin concentration[IU/L].
resultsA total of 315 participants from different countries worldwide completed the survey and 231/315(73%) respondents administer heparin during EVT. The majority administered heparin only through flush fluids (168/231; 72.7%), followed by both IV-bolus and flush fluids (36/231; 16%), and those who used only an IV-bolus (27/231; 11.7%). From the participants that administer heparin through flush fluids, the median heparin concentration was 2000 IU/L (range:100 IU/L-10000 IU/L). The total heparin dose (administered through flush fluids and IV-bolus) among 23 respondents showed a median of 4650 IU/h (IQR:3432-5900). Among the respondents who administer heparin through IV-bolus only, the median was 5250 IU (IQR:3750-7500).
conclusionThis survey revealed variable heparin doses administered by physicians worldwide during EVT and reflects the lack of international guidelines. Caution is warranted, specifically during complex/long EVT procedures. Furthermore, heparin flush doses should be considered in future trials regarding periprocedural anticoagulants, since imbalances could potentially confound results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.