ArticleDysphagia2025
Psychometric Properties of Dysphagia Handicap Index Scale for Older Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in China.
Article in Dysphagia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) on older adults is recognized in Western countries but has not received sufficient attention in China. The dysphagia handicap index (DHI) scale is an OD quality-of-life evaluation instrument. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of DHI scale in older Chinese adults. A total of 600 older adults were recruited from five nursing homes in one city to complete the 25-item scale. The reliability and validity of the scale were evaluated: internal consistency was investigated using Cronbach's alpha; test-retest reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient; the content validity of the scale was evaluated using content validity ratio; and the factor structure was examined using an exploratory factor analysis, principal component analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale was divided into three subscales: physical, functional, and emotional. Cronbach's alpha was 0.97 for the entire scale and between 0.89 and 0.94 for the three subscales. The item-to-total correlation coefficients for the three subscales were between 0.63 and 0.92, and the test-retest correlation coefficient was 0.87. The content validity was 0.93. In the factor analysis, these three factors accounted for 75.3% variance of 25 items. The confirmatory factor analysis was significant (p < 0.0001). The Chinese version of dysphagia index scale had good reliability and validity. Thus, it can provide a subjective evaluation of older adults with OD and can be used by clinicians to improve the outcomes of older adults with OD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.