Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025294›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025

Phase-field simulation of crack growth in cortical bone microstructure: parameter identification and comparison against experiments.

Jenny Carlsson, Olivia Karlsson, Hanna Isaksson, Anna Gustafsson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenny CarlssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden. jenny.carlsson@bme.lth.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3950-8840
Olivia KarlssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.
Hanna IsakssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9690-8907
Anna GustafssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, Box 118, 221 00, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5735-9503

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2023-04055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models are commonly used to investigate how the cortical bone microstructure affects fracture resistance; recently, phase-field models have been introduced for this purpose. However, experimentally measured material parameters for the microstructural tissues are lacking. Moreover, as no validation studies have been published, it remains unclear to what extent classical phase-field methods, assuming linear-elastic, brittle fracture, accurately represent bone. In this study, we address both these shortcomings by first applying a design-of-experiments methodology to calibrate a set of material parameters for a two-dimensional phase-field finite element model of bovine osteonal microstructure. This was achieved by comparing the outcomes from simulation to data from single-edge notched bending experiments on bovine osteonal bone and subsequent imaging of the crack path. Second, we used these parameters in new bone geometries to evaluate the parameters and the predictive performance of the model. Reasonable agreement was achieved between prediction and experiments in terms of peak load, crack initiation toughness and crack path. However, the model is unable to capture the experimentally observed gradual evolution of damage, leading to a nonlinear force response before the onset of visible crack extension. Nor does it capture the similarly observed increase in toughness with increasing crack length. These limitations are inherent to all classical phase-field methods since they originate from theories of brittle fracture, and alternative formulations are discussed. This is the first study attempting to validate classical phase-field methods in simulation of cortical bone fracture, and it highlights both potential and limitations to be addressed in future work.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCortical BoneFractures, BoneModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleFinite Element AnalysisStress, MechanicalCement lineCrack propagationFracture toughnessOsteonPhase-field method

Identifiers

PMID40025294
PMCPMC12055898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.