ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Phase-field simulation of crack growth in cortical bone microstructure: parameter identification and comparison against experiments.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fracture Patterns of an Osteolytic Hole Involved Lumbar Vertebra, Assessed for a Case Study by Computational Models.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational models are commonly used to investigate how the cortical bone microstructure affects fracture resistance; recently, phase-field models have been introduced for this purpose. However, experimentally measured material parameters for the microstructural tissues are lacking. Moreover, as no validation studies have been published, it remains unclear to what extent classical phase-field methods, assuming linear-elastic, brittle fracture, accurately represent bone. In this study, we address both these shortcomings by first applying a design-of-experiments methodology to calibrate a set of material parameters for a two-dimensional phase-field finite element model of bovine osteonal microstructure. This was achieved by comparing the outcomes from simulation to data from single-edge notched bending experiments on bovine osteonal bone and subsequent imaging of the crack path. Second, we used these parameters in new bone geometries to evaluate the parameters and the predictive performance of the model. Reasonable agreement was achieved between prediction and experiments in terms of peak load, crack initiation toughness and crack path. However, the model is unable to capture the experimentally observed gradual evolution of damage, leading to a nonlinear force response before the onset of visible crack extension. Nor does it capture the similarly observed increase in toughness with increasing crack length. These limitations are inherent to all classical phase-field methods since they originate from theories of brittle fracture, and alternative formulations are discussed. This is the first study attempting to validate classical phase-field methods in simulation of cortical bone fracture, and it highlights both potential and limitations to be addressed in future work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.