Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025255›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

Value of clinical review for AI-guided deep vein thrombosis diagnosis with ultrasound imaging by non-expert operators.

Giancarlo Speranza, Sven Mischkewitz, Fouad Al-Noor, Bernhard Kainz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Giancarlo SperanzaDivision of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. giancarlo.speranza@nyulangone.org.
Sven MischkewitzThinkSono GmbH, Potsdam, Germany.
Fouad Al-NoorThinkSono Ltd, London, UK.
Bernhard KainzFAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) carries high morbidity, mortality, and costs globally. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) image acquisition by non-ultrasound-trained providers, supported by an AI-based guidance and remote image review system, is believed to improve the timeliness and cost-effectiveness of diagnosis. We examine a database of 381 patients with suspected DVT who underwent an AI-guided ultrasound scan by a non-ultrasound-trained nurse and an expert sonographer-performed standard compression ultrasound scan. Each AI-guided scan was reviewed remotely by blinded radiologists or blinded independent POCUS-certified American Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians. Remote reviewer and standard scan diagnoses were compared. The primary endpoint is AI-guidance system sensitivity with clinician review; secondary endpoints include specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, image quality, inter-observer image quality, and vein compressibility agreement. Data was analysed through the bootstrapping method, bootstrapping with a second reader for each scan, and a majority voting system. Eighty percent (n = 304) of scans were of sufficient diagnostic quality. Radiologist reviewer sensitivity ranged from 90%-95%, specificity from 74%-84%, NPV from 98%-99%, PPV from 30%-42%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 39%-50%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.15 and for compressibility 0.61. EM reviewer sensitivity ranged from 95%-98%, specificity from 97%-100%, NPV was 99%, PPV from 81%-100%, and potential expert-led ultrasound scans avoided from 29%-38%. Inter-observer agreement for image quality was 0.59 and for compressibility 0.67. Diagnosing lower extremity DVT through AI-guided image acquisition with clinician review is feasible. Performance is influenced by reviewer expertise. We find potential positive impacts on health economics, including safely avoiding expert-led ultrasound scans.

Identifiers

PMID40025255
PMCPMC11873262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.