ArticleScientific reports2025
Neural mechanisms underlying the after-effects of repetitive paired-pulse TMS with Β tACS on the human primary motor cortex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We previously reported that repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; rPPS) synchronized to the peak phase of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at the β frequency induced long-lasting after-effects on primary motor cortex (M1) with less inter-individual variability compared with rPPS alone. Here, we investigated the plasticity mechanisms underlying combined stimulation effects using paired-pulse TMS paradigms. rPPS was applied to the peak phase of β tACS (rPPS-tACS-peak) or sham tACS (rPPS alone), or tACS was delivered without rPPS (tACS alone). Resting motor threshold (RMT) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) were measured before and after intervention. rPPS-tACS-peak stimulation significantly increased MEPs compared with other conditions after intervention. Although I-wave interaction was expected to be produced by the facilitation effect of rPPS, rPPS-tACS-peak did not change SICF. In contrast, SAI was decreased in rPPS-tACS-peak compared with baseline. In the control experiment, rPPS-tACS-trough did not change MEPs, SAI, and SICF. Therefore, the after-effects of rPPS-tACS-peak on M1 may be caused by a partial reduction in the inhibitory circuit mediated by cholinergic interneurons, rather than an enhancement of the facilitatory effects of rPPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.