Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40025222›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neural mechanisms underlying the after-effects of repetitive paired-pulse TMS with Β tACS on the human primary motor cortex.

Hisato Nakazono, Katsuya Ogata, Tsubasa Mitsutake, Akinori Takeda, Emi Yamada, Shozo Tobimatsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hisato NakazonoDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medical Science, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, 814-0001, Japan. nakazono@takagigakuen.ac.jp.
Katsuya OgataDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy at Fukuoka, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, 831-8501, Japan.
Tsubasa MitsutakeClinical Research Center, Saga University Hospital, Saga, 849-8501, Japan.
Akinori TakedaResearch Center for Brain Communication, Research Institute, Kochi University of Technology, Kochi, 782-8502, Japan.
Emi YamadaDepartment of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
Shozo TobimatsuDepartment of Orthoptics, Faculty of Medical Science, Fukuoka International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, 814-0001, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 22H03460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that repetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; rPPS) synchronized to the peak phase of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at the β frequency induced long-lasting after-effects on primary motor cortex (M1) with less inter-individual variability compared with rPPS alone. Here, we investigated the plasticity mechanisms underlying combined stimulation effects using paired-pulse TMS paradigms. rPPS was applied to the peak phase of β tACS (rPPS-tACS-peak) or sham tACS (rPPS alone), or tACS was delivered without rPPS (tACS alone). Resting motor threshold (RMT) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), and short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) were measured before and after intervention. rPPS-tACS-peak stimulation significantly increased MEPs compared with other conditions after intervention. Although I-wave interaction was expected to be produced by the facilitation effect of rPPS, rPPS-tACS-peak did not change SICF. In contrast, SAI was decreased in rPPS-tACS-peak compared with baseline. In the control experiment, rPPS-tACS-trough did not change MEPs, SAI, and SICF. Therefore, the after-effects of rPPS-tACS-peak on M1 may be caused by a partial reduction in the inhibitory circuit mediated by cholinergic interneurons, rather than an enhancement of the facilitatory effects of rPPS.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, MotorMotor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleNeural InhibitionNeuronal PlasticityYoung AdultCombined stimulationPaired-pulse paradigmPhase dependencePrimary motor cortexRepetitive paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulationTranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40025222
PMCPMC11873315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.